|
Previous |
|
1609 The forgotten history
of Hudson, Amsterdam and New York |
|
http://www.henryhudson400.com/uploads/fck/1609_theforgottenhistory.pdf |
|
Henry Hudson in
Amsterdam By Geert Mak |
|
Henry Hudson in Amsterdam that fall of 1608. Many currently
well-known buildings and towers were missing on the town
horizon. The big merchant houses at the Prince Hendrik quay were
still to be built. The city ended approximately where its center
now lies, and the bustle was of a totally different character
too. Most of the buildings were half the size they are at
present. A fortification like the Weeping Tower – now an old
café you casually pass – was then a powerful fist thrusting into
the harbor. What Hudson saw, from the place where the Central
Station now stands, was a forest of masts and towers, riddled
with sails, pennants and flags. Beyond lay a city on the move; a
bevy of ships, cranes, dock-hands, workmen and other folk. In
front of all that, however, a curious transition area was
located, a salty, sloshing and tranquil water landscape, a long
strip of old jetties, rotting bollards, wooden watch houses, and
everywhere bobbing ships, small and large. Our sailor first had
to pass through this flurry of activity, before he could
penetrate the thicket of the Warmoesstraat and the Nes – then
the busiest streets in the city – and before he would pay his
respects at one of the merchant houses in the now infamous
red-light district, then n the autumn of 1608 an English sailor
arrived in Amsterdam: a rash Briton who would achieve world fame
because of a journey he himself regarded as a failure, a certain
Henry Hudson. The sailor probably began his acquaintance with
the city at the same place as the present-day rail traveler: the
old harbor. In the months to follow the city and sailor would
become involved with each other a great deal; in fact they would
write world history together – though in a totally different way
from what either foresaw. The city had already existed for a
couple of centuries, but Amsterdam was still young, was made
with such innovations as a commodity exchange, a unique trading
place for merchants, and also an exchange bank that modernized
currency exchange in a profound way. For the first time in the
history of commerce any currency in the world could be traded
for stable certificates. Furthermore that winter the greatest
city expansion plan in Europe since Roman times was diligently
being drawn: three grand canals, plus a working-class district
and a town rampart that would enclose the old city. About a year
later definitive decisions would be made about the design of
this growing city. Meanwhile tens of thousands of newcomers
remained outside the gates, as we can read in contemporary
journals, living in “humble dwellings” or in slums against the
city wall, and in its niches. Along the paths and polder ditches
– especially around the western city gate – lay
districts--populated with workshops, modest houses or huts,
often with vegetable gardens and pig sties--largely habited by
immigrants. In the last decades of the 16th century the
population of Amsterdam had tripled and a huge part of this new
citizenry came from the Southern Netherlands. home to one of the
most stately of canals. To take care of business, Hudson would
make his way to a brand new building: the East India House - now
a university complex, then the center of the first multinational
company in the world, the Dutch East India Company. Henry Hudson
perceived the city during one of the most important transitions
in its history. Here and there in Amsterdam rows of wooden
houses from the Middle Ages still existed, with pointy, tilting
facades such as you can sometimes still find in small German
towns. While the young Dutch Republic was still at war with
feudal Spain, negotiations had been started, and the following
year an armistice would be signed. The city still lay packed
tightly within its old walls and gates. For most of his business
Hudson had to walk only a couple of minutes. His most important
patron, the merchant Dirck Van Os, lived in the Nes, so that
most discussions about routes and maps took place in the nearby
Saint Olof Chapel. His other patrons resided in the East India
House, and of course he often passed through the Dam Square, the
administrative and governmental heart of the city. But that same
year, 1608, a new beginning the Amsterdam publishing industry
achieved international fame. The Sephardic Jews lay the
foundations for the tobacco trade and the diamond industry. Even
the language changed: the traditional Amsterdam dialect was
gradually being replaced by Antwerp slang. It was because of
these networks – along with their knowledge of the Portuguese
voyages of exploration that had reached the Dutch Republic
through the grapevine – that the citizens of Amsterdam succeeded
in breaching the Portuguese trade monopoly first in Africa, and
later in Asia. In March 1594 nine merchants met at the wine
house of Martin Spil in the Warmoesstraat – among them Dirck Van
Os, Reynier Pauw, Pieter Dircksz. Hasselaer and Arent ten
Grootenhuys - men Hudson would later have dealings with. They
agreed to collectively equip an expedition to the Far East.
Under the command of Cornelis de Houtman, four ships were sent
off, of which, after two long years, only three returned. The
profits were meager and a distressing number of the crew did not
survive the journey, but one fact had been proven: a direct
crossing from the Netherlands to Southeast Asia was feasible.
Antwerp had been deserted after the Spaniards conquered the city
in 1585, and the Dutch Republic had blocked the River Schelde,
the lifeline of Antwerp’s harbor. Tens of thousands of
Protestants and other dissidents, including many rich merchants
and artisans, had moved north to Amsterdam, taking with them
their knowledge, skills and trade networks. Because of the
persecutions of the Spanish Inquisition, there were Sephardic
Jews among the displaced. At first driven north from the Iberian
peninsula, they initially arrived in Antwerp. But after the
collapse of Antwerp, they moved north again, especially to
Amsterdam. All these immigrants arrived at exactly the right
time in the right place– something that does not always happen
in history. In the burgeoning Republic there was a great demand
for new trade connections and for artisans to produce luxury
products. Within one generation the immigrants from the Southern
Netherlands controlled a third of the Amsterdam staples market.
Their craftsmen introduced the silk industry and sugar
refineries. They brought with them new painting techniques and
thanks to them, along with the relative tolerance of the city
administration, fortifications at the Cape – later Cape Town –
and in Southeast Asia – Batavia, today Jakarta – though they
never actually colonized these areas. The Dutch East India
Company remained a trading operation, powerful and violent
indeed, but ultimately a business, that operated along the
coasts of Africa and the archipelago of Southeast Asia. For this
multinational enterprise the trade among the nations of
Southeast Asia, China, India, Ceylon (now Sri Lanka) and the
rest of Asia was at least as important as European trade with
the East. Henry Hudson was also confronted with this dynamic
community of immigrants in the growing city. One of them was
Dirck Van Os, the person who would eventually sign his contract,
a member of an eminent family from Antwerp who had made his
fortune in Amsterdam as a grain- and wood merchant, trading with
Russia and the Baltic states. He was a founder of the City
Exchange Bank and headed the reclamation of the Beemster, one of
the oldest polders, or wetlands, in Holland, but he was also one
of the founders of the Dutch East India Company. The oldest
stock certificate in the world that still exists, a Dutch East
India Company share from September 1606, Only one year later 22
ships from Holland and the southern province of Zeeland set sail
for the rich Spice Islands, and by 1602 an impressive 65 ships
had set sail for the East. The Portuguese could not maintain
their trade monopoly to Southeast Asia; the number of seafarers
that sailed from Lisbon declined dramatically. In the 17th
century a safe trade route to the East was worth more than gold.
Along with pepper, trade also included rubber, ivory, sugar and
from Africa, gold. The Dutch approach to this high stakes gamble
was to share the risk. An Amsterdam ship owner did not own a
ship, but bought a part: sometimes only a tenth, or in some
cases a share in the ownership of tens of ships. Through such
joint enterprises, named compagnieën – companies – the Dutch
merchants financed the most risky ventures: even if they all
failed, their losses would be limited. In 1602 the companies
that sailed Southeast Asia merged into the Verenigde Oost-
Indische Compagnie (VOC) or the Dutch East India Company: the
first multinational in the world. For two centuries the Dutch
East India Company would monopolize all Dutch trade with and
shipping to Asia. Furthermore, they built hazardous expeditions
of the Dutch East India Company, and a fundamentalist theologian
who in 1601 had pleaded for a prohibition of public services for
Lutherans, because they had a different viewpoint than he had in
certain doctrines. At first Plancius succeeded in his mission;
the merchant mayors that governed the city swallowed his
theological disquisitions, as long as he provided them with the
results of his study of his globes. His cartographic knowledge
after all was indispensable for further expeditions. But they
rapidly changed opinion when the Lutheran Baltic states, as well
as the King of Denmark, took a stand for their fellow believers.
They did not want to offend such important trading partners. The
Lutherans regained their rights. Even when it came to matters of
the soul and salvation, within certain boundaries, the highest
bidder prevailed. In 1608 a typical incident occurred in the
Republic, a story saved from oblivion by Voltaire who recounted
it in his historic treatises. The Marquis Spinola and the
diplomat Richardot were on their way to The Hague as part of a
distinguished Spanish delegation to negotiate a is signed by Van
Os and fellow director Arent ten Grootenhuys. For years Van Os
had conducted his Russian trade in close partnership with Isaac
Le Maire, also a southerner, from Doornik, today a city in
Belgium. Together they gave birth to the Dutch East India
Company, but three years later Le Maire left the Company after a
charge of fraud, and probably fell out with his old companion
Van Os too. Hudson also became part of this feud. The vindictive
Le Maire has made his mark in history as the inventor of the
practice called “naked short selling.” In 1609 when he decided
to get rid of his stake in the Dutch East India Company, he
speculated on falling prices, even selling more shares than he
owned, in the hope that he could buy them back later for lower
prices. This ploy is still a favorite activity at the world’s
stock exchanges, especially for hedge funds that don’t shy away
from risks. That winter Hudson also had intensive contact with
the Flemish Petrus Platevoet – who had Romanized his name to
Petrus Plancius – a fierce Calvinistic clergyman, as well as one
of the most important map makers of the Republic. He was both
the driving force behind several fashioned zealot who
simultaneously was a forerunner of modern cartography. And
Reinier Pauw, another director of the Dutch East India Company
had been the mayor, eight times, of the rapidly changing
Amsterdam, as shown in a portrait by Jan Ravensteyn wearing
dark, modest and unfashionable clothing with no hint of either
his authority or his wealth. Especially in the sea provinces,
feudal relations were almost nonexistent. The value system
placed money on a higher scale than family connections,
prestige, or even respectability. “In this city there’s not a
person who doesn’t trade,” wrote French philosopher René
Descartes, when he landed in Amsterdam around 1635. “Everybody
is so fulfilled with his own profit, that I could live here my
whole life without being noticed by anyone.” The British
historian J.L. Price would later compare the stories of foreign
visitors of the young Republic with the experiences of young
Europeans nowadays who see America for the first time:
everything seemed familiar, but was in fact a quarter of a turn
different. What disoriented 17th century visitors to Amsterdam
was the open political debate, the shocking religious treaty
with the Dutch. En route they saw a party of ten men disembark a
simple small boat, sit down on the grass and consume a meal of
beer, bread and cheese; everyone brought his own provisions.
From a nearby farmer the diplomats learned to their amazement
who these people were: “These are the delegates of our States,
our independent lords and masters.” It was, in short, the Dutch
delegation with whom the Spanish delegation would have to
negotiate on equal terms in the weeks to come. The Spaniards and
French could not stop remarking on the simple lifestyle that
even the elite maintained, though the Dutch found it perfectly
normal. Without any doubt it had something to do with fact that
prosperity, power and wealth had arrived really quite abruptly
to this generation of citizens. Hudson’s patrons were
multifaceted men. For instance, Pieter Dircksz. Hasselaer, had
as a young man played a heroic role in the Spanish siege of
Haarlem in 1573 during the Dutch war of independence. Now
Hasselaer, one of the richest merchants of the Republic, sent
out expeditions to Asia and to the outer edges of the pole. The
same diversity of interest marked the life and notions of Petrus
Plancius: the old25 cost mounds of money and blocked free trade.
Yet the stadhouder, Prince Maurits, had aspirations to the
throne and wanted to continue fighting in order to “liberate”
the Southern Netherlands as well. A raging pamphlet war occurred
between the Orangists, or royalists, and Van Oldebarneveldt’s
peace party. The power base of the Republic, Amsterdam,
supported the Prince, but entirely for its own reasons: the
Spaniards were willing to recognize the Republic as a sovereign
state if the Dutch agreed to withdraw from Asia and the Atlantic
area. Van Oldebarneveldt was not disposed to this strategy,
because waging a war and maintaining an army of 60,000 men
consumed a great deal of money. Furthermore, he argued, if peace
returned, the declining trade with Southern Europe would resume
quickly. On the other hand, the merchants of Amsterdam feared a
peace treaty would put an end to their new trade in Asia and
South America, as well as to their lucrative piracy of Spanish
ships. And clergyman Plancius the uncompromising Calvinist and
founder of the Dutch East India Company, certainly did not want
to hear about peace. Meanwhile we know very little about the
tolerance, the unlimited urbanization, and the new humanism in a
Europe that still was profoundly conservative. In some ways the
Republic was old-fashioned too. The organization of the trades
followed the medieval guild structure, but in economic and
social life, the Netherlands was far ahead of the rest of
Europe. Or, as Price argues, it was a small, prematurely
capitalistic outpost in a Europe that remained mainly medieval.
In a word, since the 1590’s these calm territories had been
struck by a spirit of courage bordering on euphoria. Amsterdam
was well on its way to becoming the financial center of the
known world. Throughout society Dutch people shared in the
success of trade and shipping. In the stock registers of the
Dutch East and West India Companies appear thousands of names,
ranging from mayors and merchants to clergymen, school teachers
and even servants. The harsh social realities of the 16th
century were a distant memory. Still, during that winter of 1608
into 1609, internal tensions about the war with Spain mounted.
The most powerful official of the Dutch Republic, Grand
Pensionary Van Oldebarneveldt, wanted to rapidly terminate the
hostilities that past of our British sailor. When Henry Hudson
turned up in Amsterdam, he was about forty years old, an
experienced captain with three sons – his first grandchild had
just been born - who in the last years had acquired a certain
renown for his quests to find a northern passage to Southeast
Asia and China. There were two possible routes: northwest via
Canada, or northeast, around Russia. If a northern route
existed, it would offer important advantages over the existing
route to Asia, around the Cape of Good Hope. It would avoid the
problems with the heat, and long-lasting calms, plus the many
pirates who waited in ambush along the southern routes. Fifteen
years earlier, Dirck Van Os and his fellow merchants had sent
out three expeditions to the north, encouraged by Petrus
Plancius who was convinced of the possibilities of such a
passage. From behind his globes in the Saint Olof Chapel,
Plancius propagated the theory – derived from the British
adventurer Robert Thorne – that the five months of continuous
sunshine in the pole area had to generate so much heat in the
summer that the pole was warmer – even ice free - than the
surrounding, southern seas. Behind the cold barrier, blocked by
icebergs and other obstacles, he speculated, a milder zone had
to exist. The last Dutch expedition, led by Willem Barentszoon
in 1596, was stranded in the drifting ice of Nova Zembla in the
Artic Ocean. Crew members withstood a horrifying winter in a
house built out of wreckage. Twelve members of the crew
eventually managed to return to Amsterdam in one piece, with
tales that would give chills to many generations of
schoolchildren. Thereafter these trips to the north halted.
Eleven years later Henry Hudson tried to find the northern
passage, under the auspices of the London Muscovy Company. His
first voyage, in 1607, was of an unprecedented foolhardiness:
instead of sailing around the pole via the east or west, he
tried to go across it. He came within six hundred miles of the
pole, he defied storms and even a whale that tried to surface
while under his ship, but in the end he noted wryly in his log:
“This morning we saw that we were compassed in ice in abundance…
And this I can assure at present…by this way there is no
passage.” His second expedition in spring 1608 via the
northeastern route also failed, after which his patrons deserted
him. When the Dutch Consul in London got wind of this
predicament - knowing some in conversations with our undaunted
explorer. Their exchange of ideas encouraged both Hudson and
Plancius tremendously, especially in their speculation on the
existence of a relative “warm” polar region. Hudson thought he
had seen grazing animals in the far north on previous
expeditions, and there were reports about an open sea around the
pole. At the same time as their discussions were occurring, a
diplomatic intrigue was unfolding. The huge success of the Dutch
East India Company had come to the attention of the French King,
Henry IV, who wanted of expand and modernize French trade with a
similar enterprise. He had sent expeditions to Canada, but more
recently the monarch was intent on Asian trade, possibly via a
still-to-be discovered northern route. The French ambassadors in
The Hague tried to ferret out as much information as possible
from the Dutch – just as Dutch sailors and mapmakers had done
earlier with the Portuguese; they even managed to pump Petrus
Plancius for particulars. But their biggest ally turned out to
be Isaac Le Maire, the rich and embittered Amsterdam merchant,
co-founder of the Dutch East India Amsterdam merchants were
still interested in the northern passage - he referred Hudson to
them. Thus our sailor set sail from London, in the spring of
1608, for the Netherlands, at the request of the Amsterdam
Chamber of the Dutch East India Company. For Dirck Van Os and
his fellow merchants, a northern passage was once again high on
their agenda--this time not for nautical reasons, but to stay
ahead of all possible competition, from within as well as from
outside the Republic. The facts were that the Dutch East India
Company possessed exclusive rights to trade with Asia via the
southern routes, but everybody was free to make an attempt by
way of the north. Documents show this had worried the Board of
Directors for years. So they were interested in Hudson’s
expedition chiefly for political reasons: a northern passage
could be hazardous for their lucrative trade monopoly;
consequently they had to be the first to find one. They also
knew that if a peace treaty was signed with Spain, they would be
forced to find an alternative route to Asia. Petrus Plancius had
his own motives. In Amsterdam the famed cartographer was finally
able to compare theory and experience put their plans in a whole
different perspective. When the Dutch East India Company got
wind of Hudson’s double play, they used this opportunity to sign
a contract with Hudson. Alarmed, the French King sent Le Maire a
vast sum of money to also persuade Hudson to sign a contract,
but it was too late. Henry Hudson would set sail under the flag
of the Republic, but just barely. History easily might have
taken another course. It was a period of historic fault lines,
that winter of 1608 into 1609, as tensions mounted between old
and new, modernity and tradition, in ways that would determine
the course of history. The plan to construct the canals of
Amsterdam was one typical outcome of the fast accumulation of
wealth and the style of the 17th century. Canals were an
inventive way to create boulevards along which the citizens
would parade, while they would also provide a system of
transport and reservoir of the polder water. With this urban
plan Amsterdam had to become an ultramodern city with – unique
for that time- separate working and living districts. At the
same time it remained an old-fashioned water city, in the middle
of a swampland, and the street pattern of Company, who was
expelled from the enterprise. Le Maire saw the French initiative
that would diminish the monopoly of the Dutch East India Company
as the perfect vehicle for revenge. The Dutch East India Company
directors were very much aware of this possibility, which
fuelled their sense of urgency. Le Maire, who knew exactly why
Hudson had been summoned to Amsterdam, approached the sailor
directly. Records of a French ambassador show that Le Maire did
everything in his power to encourage Hudson to join the service
of King Henry IV. Hudson didn’t decline initially, and he openly
shared with the French the same information he gave to the Dutch
East India Company. Thus a silent war over the explorer took
place that fall of 1608. Although the Amsterdam chamber of the
Dutch East India Company wanted to send Hudson on his way,
despite certain hesitations, they needed permission from their
colleagues in other parts of the country, especially from
Zeeland. And Le Maire had to suspend talks with Hudson too,
since the French rightfully assumed the anticipated armistice
with Spain would hurt the Dutch East India Company, without
French intervention. This armistice would had the final word; no
single authority existed. As in all the political institutions
of the Republic, members of the Dutch East India Company were
zealous about “common consent,” or unanimity and consensus. Even
as early as the 17th century the Dutch had an uncontrollable
inclination to assemble and to “polder” or debate until
consensus is reached. This inclination based on the collective
decision-making they were accustomed to as they worked together
to reclaim their wetlands, or polders, in order to develop more
usable land. Everything revolved around the art of persuasion,
convincing others through debate. A form of democracy prevailed,
at least in theory; the Dutch parliament granted the Dutch East
India Company rights of monopoly; in turn the Company had to
offer the opportunity to all citizens of the Republic the right
to buy stock certificates of ownership. Of course, this wasn’t
always the most efficient method for decisive exercise of power.
And that’s why the Amsterdam chamber of the Company nearly
missed out on Henry Hudson, because they had to wait for
permission from Zeeland. But such problems were usually resolved
in a flexible way, with the almost innate tendency to
compromise, the future workman’s district, the Jordaan, neatly
copied the clever rhythm of polder pathways and ditches that had
been the pattern since the Middle Ages in Holland. Despite the
breach with the past, the urban society also maintained strong
medieval traits. The guild associations continued to exist, as
did numerable charitable institution. Since those institutes had
to serve a much bigger city than medieval Amsterdam, they grew
into– for that time – enormous sizes. The Aalmoezeniersweeshuis,
an orphanage, frequently lodged more than eight hundred orphans
at public expense. The Dutch East India Company functioned with
the same dualism. On the one hand the Company ranked as the
world’s biggest enterprise during the 17th and 18th centuries,
but at the same time it was run like a medieval polder
household. It’s no coincidence that hardly any names of
individual entrepreneurs and merchants of the famous 17th
century ended up in the history books because power lay in the
hands of a collective: the assembly of the Heren Zeventien; the
seventeen gentlemen. This board was made up of eight members
from Amsterdam, four from Zeeland, and five administrators of
smaller cities. Nobody disposal, well equipped with a crew,
provisions and other necessities. He would have to depart in
early April to search for a northern passage, round the north of
Nova Zembla and then travel southwards again, en route to Asia.
Subsequently he would have to return and pass on “all journals,
courses, maps and everything that had happened to him during the
voyage, without holding anything back.” The modest ship he was
allocated was the Halve Maen, Half Moon, a triple-masted yacht
of 85 feet (26 metres), with a crew of sixteen men. For the
entire expedition, his pay was eight hundred guilders at a time
when the monthly salary of a captain in the merchant navy was
between fifty to sixty guilders. Should he not have returned
within a year, the Dutch East India Company would have paid two
hundred guilders to his wife, and with that sum be relieved of
all further obligations. Thus our sailor departed from Amsterdam
on the 4th of April 1609, to set sail two days later, on April
6, from Texel Island into the North Sea. Three days later the
delegates from Spain and the Republic signed a twelve-year
armistice. A definitive peace settlement was delayed because to
scheme, to plot strategies. The established order, which was for
the general good, must be preserved. The polder had to remain
dry. The appointment of Henry Hudson was completed in the
twilight of the backrooms of the Dutch East India Company filled
with compromise and fait accompli. If it had been up to Zeeland,
as documents later show, the Company would have severed all
contacts with Henry Hudson when they discovered his dealings
with the French. Hudson also had “big disputes” with
quartermaster Dirk Gerritszoon about the pay for some English
crew members who would sail with him. Hudson is starting “to
mutiny, even under our eyes,” the Zeelanders wrote to their
colleagues in Amsterdam. “Imagine what he will do when he is far
away from us.” The Zeeland chamber wanted to press on with the
northern expedition but only under command of “an able, wise and
experienced person.” Their objection arrived too late: on the
8th of January 1609 the Amsterdam administrators, lead by Dirck
Van Os, energized by their rivalry with opponent Le Maire, had
already signed the contract with Henry Hudson. According to this
deed Hudson got “a small ship or yacht” at his had kept his
honor. The clergyman and mapmaker Petrus Plancius would,
together with the stern and powerful merchant mayor Reynier Pauw,
in later years play a major part in the fall of Grand Pensionary
Van Oldebarneveldt and thereafter in his execution on charge of
“high treason” in 1619. The events read like a Shakespearian
tragedy. But religious issues, as often in the Netherlands, only
seemed to predominate. Underneath the veneer of religion lay
commercial motives. Pauw and his followers turned against Van
Oldenbarneveldt and his peace policy mainly because a treaty
with the Spaniards was commercially inconvenient for them. Not
until 1648 would Amsterdam agree to a peace treaty. In the years
to come Amsterdam would blossom into the seventeenth century
version of New York, a city of novelty, bubbling with life and
creativity, linked with all parts of the known world – if only
for a while. For his part, Henry Hudson Hudson sailed off into
the sea. Never again would he return to Amsterdam. the
Netherlands did not want to abandon trade with Asia and America.
Only for the duration of the armistice, the merchants of the
Republic were prepared to maintain the status quo and refrain
from setting up a separate West Indian Company for North and
South America. That Company was founded as soon as the armistice
with Spain ended. Hudson’s immediate patron, merchant Dirck Van
Os, embarked – among many other activities – on a golden career
as a polder governor of “his” polder, the Beemster. Another
patron, Arent ten Grootenhuys, is portrayed proudly in front of
his company of riflemen in a painting in the gallery of the
Amsterdam Historical Museum. Their opponent, Isaac Le Maire,
left the city two years later after his speculations misfired.
Later he founded an Australian Company, a counterpart of the
Dutch East India Company, and a newly discovered strait near
Vuurland, at the tip of South America, was named the Strait Le
Maire. On his tombstone in the town church of Egmond-Binnen he
had inscribed that he had been “blessed abundantly by the Lord,”
because though he had lost more than one and a half million
guilders in thirty years. |
|
The Accidental
Legacy of Henry Hudson By Russell Shorto |
|
unforgiving universe of heaving seas and low sky, the crew
– half English and half Dutch – became bitterly divided. Mutiny
darkened the air. Their objective was to find a shortcut to the
riches of Asia. The instructions from their masters, the Dutch
East India Company in Amsterdam, were unusually clear: they were
to take a northeast route, skirting the pole, through the icy
waters of northern Russia. The contract specifically ordered
their captain that he “think of discovering no other routes”
than this. What was to be done now? Turn around and head back to
port, admitting failure? Push onward somehow, into an increasing
likelihood of death? A wise old historian once told me that his
greatest professional frustration had to do with the one-word
question why? Historical records – immigration forms, ships’
logs, wills – give us names, ages, deeds, but rarely explain why
people emigrated, explored, loved, went to war, and otherwise
made important decisions. We know a lot about the human past,
but often people fail to record this simple thing, the most
human thing, the key to our dreams and our inner hearts. Henry
Hudson, English explorer, left t was getting harder to stay
alive with each passing hour. Somehow, amid the pitching of the
waves, the first mate managed to pick up a pen to scratch the
date – the nineteenth of May, 1609 – and record a few words in
the log: “Much trouble with fogges, sometimes, and more
dangerous of Ice… with much wind and snow and very cold.” They
had been at sea more than a month – sixteen or so men in a small
wooden ship – at first uneventfully, but as they edged toward
the pole, heading northeast along the coast of Norway, they
sailed into “close stormie weather,” and as it intensified the
men approached the limits of endurance. Alone in an behind no
direct answer to the question of why he did what he did during
the course of his adventurous life. We are left to surmise it
from the deeds themselves and the way he conducted himself. And
yet, I think we can get a pretty clear idea of what drove him
across the globe, of the force that impelled this dark,
brooding, dogged man and led him – albeit unwittingly – to alter
the course of human history. This was not the first time that
Hudson would be faced with near-mutiny, and it would not be the
last. There was a grimness about him, a hard inexorability. Some
explorers from the great era of discovery were outsized
personalities. The Italian Giovanni Cabotto (aka John Cabot),
for example, regaled citizens of his adopted city of London with
flamboyant tales of his exploits, and promised people he met in
pubs that he would name newly discovered islands after them.
Hudson exhibited no such charm. His chief trait was constancy:
he was an unrelenting hunter, a seeker after the scope of the
earth. His one dream was to find a short route to Asia. And he
was willing to do almost anything to achieve that dream. He had
previously made several attempts of stupendous effort, including
trying to sail straight over the North Pole. Now, amid the noise
of wind, he told his crew that he would violate his orders,
change course and sail the little vessel westward – across the
Atlantic. Based in part on letters from his friend John Smith,
who was even now fighting for survival along with other members
of the Jamestown colony in Virginia, Hudson had become convinced
that the best chance of success in the quest to reach the Sea of
Japan was straight through what we now know to be the
staggeringly vast expanse of North America. The absurdity of
this is mitigated somewhat when we consider that at the time the
best calculation of the size of the earth was still that of the
Greek geographer Ptolemy, who had estimated it to be about
one-third smaller than it actually is. So it was reasonable for
a mariner like Hudson to reckon that the portion of the earth no
one knew about – the American west and much of the Pacific Ocean
– simply didn’t exist. Further, John Smith had told him of a
channel somewhere to the north of the Virginia colony that cut
through the land mass. This, Hudson concluded, must be a path
between the Atlantic and Pacific. In today’s terms, his idea was
that he would sail a channel that cut through the northeastern
states of the United States and, instead of reaching, say, Ohio,
he would find himself bearing down on the Japanese coast. The
boldness, the epic pig-headedness and determination of men such
as Hudson beggars the imagination today. There on the deck of
the Half Moon, amid the roiling gray-black waters of the North
Sea, he convinced his men that he was right. It would have been
relatively easy for them to believe him: they were programmed to
think their captain was a special human being, someone who knew
things, and there would surely have been great comfort in
yielding to that trust. Only Hudson himself would have known how
flimsy was the foundation for his belief. So they changed
everything and set off on a new course, straight across the
Atlantic – and, as they say, into history. This improvised part
of the voyage was far less treacherous. By the second of July
the had reached the great fishing bank off Newfoundland. From
there they veered southward, and continued all the way to
presentday Virginia, where Hudson’s friend John Smith was.
Hudson didn’t venture into the Chesapeake Bay, however, but
headed back northward, on the lookout now for the channel that
he believed would lead to Asia. They found one likely candidate
– the Delaware River – but it was too shallow. On the fourth of
September they entered “a very good Harbour” where they caught
“ten great Mullets, of a foot and a halfe long a peece, and a
Ray as great as foure men could hale into the ship.” It was New
York Harbor. Because the river they then followed – which would
of course later take its name from Hudson – is a tidal river,
and thus salty, Hudson had reason to believe he was in a channel
between two oceans. The whole region enchanted them. “The River
is a mile broad,” the first mate wrote, and “there is very high
Land on both sides… The land is the finest for cultivation that
I have ever in my life set foot upon.” They encountered natives
in several places, and traded with some and fought with others.
They continued past Manhattan Island and on up, all the way to
north of present-day Albany, before realizing that the bed was
narrowing and the water no longer salty. This was not the route
to Asia. Hudson gave the order to turn about. They sailed back
to Europe. In England – where Hudson had put into harbor en
route back to the Dutch Republic – a new adventure began. Hudson
was arrested for having sailed “to the detriment of his
country.” His ship’s log was confiscated. Spies circled around
his crew, sniffing for information. Hudson’s account of
limitless timber, of beavers and foxes, of a world-class harbor,
got the attention of the English rulers, and also of Dutch
merchant-adventurers, who began to plan expeditions to explore
the new region. Hudson himself, however, had little interest in
these things. For him, North America was merely a vast obstacle
in the path to the true goal. By the next sailing season he had
won new backing, from England, and set off again toward North
America, this time in search of a northwest passage he expected
to find at a higher latitude, through northern Canada. He
cajoled and tonguelashed his crew through more hellish expanses
of ice, refusing to hear their growing chorus of laments, until,
finally, on June 22, 1611, the men, weakened by scurvy and
hunger, had had enough. At the far southern edge of the vast
stretch of icy water that would later become known as Hudson
Bay, they set Hudson, several crewmembers who had remained loyal
to him, and Hudson’s young son John, who had chosen the wrong
voyage on which to accompany his father, into the ship’s small
accompanying shallop. Sometime after the mutineers set sail they
could see the shallop behind them sailing gamely, but the small
boat was not meant for sea voyages; in time, the rebel sailors
lost sight of it. They returned to England, and were soon
embroiled in court cases. Henry Hudson – who would make history
of a kind he had never imagined – died an icy death, a victim of
his own obsession, having failed to achieve the only objective
that ever mattered to him. Probably it was not two individuals
but two small groups of men who met on a quietly fateful day in
1626 in a roughly constructed fort on the edge of the limitless
expanse of North American wilderness. One comprised Dutch
soldiers. The other was made up of Mahican Indians, their hair
long and “coarse as a horse’s tail,” as one writer would put it,
and likely wearing deerskins tied around the waist. In the years
immediately after Henry Hudson’s voyage, on the basis of which
the Dutch Republic laid claim to a wide swath of the eastern
seaboard of the North American continent, a few Dutch
expeditions reached the area, charting and doing small amounts
of trade with native groups. Then, in 1621, with the end of a
12-year truce in the long war of independence the Dutch were
waging against the Spanish Empire, a new concern was
established. The Dutch East India Company – which had funded
Hudson’s voyage – had proved very successful at doing business
in Asia. Now the newly formed Dutch West India Company hoped to
do the same. Its mission was twofold: to extract products from
North America as well as the Caribbean and South America, and to
fight the Spanish in those regions. It was in this context that
the WIC organized a colony in the region sailed by Hudson, using
his voyage as the basis for the Dutch claim to the area. They
called the colony New Netherland. In contemporary terms, it
stretched from Albany, New York, to the Delaware River in the
south, and comprised all or parts of five future American
states: New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Connecticut and
Delaware. Beginning in 1624 and 1625 the first groups of
settlers and traders went out from the United Provinces (as the
Dutch Republic was also called). The Dutch idea of laying claim
to territory involved occupation, so even though these first
settlement groups were tiny – numbering in the fives and tens –
they were spread out across this vast region: a few up the North
River (which would later be named the Hudson River), a few
further south on the same river, a few at what they called the
Fresh River (later the Connecticut River), a few more at the
aptly named South River (now the Delaware). They built very
primitive homes by digging pits, lining them with wood and
covering them with bark, and got to work clearing and tilling
land and establishing relations with the Indians with whom they
would trade for beaver and other pelts. All went reasonably well
the first year. Then one day in 1626 the Mahicans came into Fort
Orange, the Dutch settlement far up the North River, and made a
proposal to its commander, Daniel van Crieckenbeeck. The
Mahicans were in a longstanding, on-again, off-again feud with
the Mohawk Indians. The Mahican leader proposed to Van
Crieckenbeeck that the Dutch and Mahicans enter an alliance;
each would help the other if attacked. Since the Dutch traded
with the Mahicans, Van Crieckenbeeck thought it a sound idea,
and agreed. Shortly after, seven Dutchmen joined a Mahican party
as they marched into the forest to scout the Mohawk. A battle
ensued, and four of the Dutchmen, including Van Crieckenbeeck,
were killed. News of the killings rippled through the farflung
Dutch settlements, and caused a panic. To the south, another
group of settlers was clustered on a dot of an island in the
harbor that the Dutch called Noten Island (later Governor’s
Island), which had been picked out to be the capital of the
colony. There had been minor turmoil here, as the settlers were
unhappy with their leader. They chose a new one, named Peter
Minuit, and at around the same time news of the Indian killings
to the north reached them. Minuit acted almost at once. He had
realized both that Noten Island was too small to serve as a base
and that the idea of spreading tiny groups of settlers across
hundreds of miles of territory was foolhardy. The Indian attack
spurred him to action. He recalled all the farflung settlers,
and he repositioned them, together, on the larger island a
stone’s throw from Noten Island, deciding that it would better
serve as a capital. The Indians called it, in their language,
“island of hills,” or Manahatta. Shortly thereafter, Minuit
negotiated a treaty with the Indians for it. This treaty was
long ago lost, but some months after this historic event
occurred a ship from New Netherland arrived in the Dutch
Republic bringing word of it. A Dutch government officer named
Peter Schaghen documented the contents of the ship, and wrote a
letter giving government leaders the news. The so-called
Schaghen letter has become one of history’s more remarkable
documents, for it indicates so sharply and prosaically this
moment in time: High and Mighty Lords, Yesterday the ship the
Arms of Amsterdam arrived here. It sailed from New Netherland
out of the River Mauritius on the 23d of September. They report
that our people are in good spirit and live in peace. The women
also have borne some children there. They have purchased the
Island Manhattes from the Indians for the value of 60 guilders.
It is 11,000 morgens in size. They had all their grain sowed by
the middle of May, and reaped by the middle 53 | The Accidental
Legacy of Henry Hudson of August. They sent samples of these
summer grains: wheat, rye, barley, oats, buckwheat, canary seed,
beans and flax. The cargo of the aforesaid ship is: 7246 Beaver
skins 178½ Otter skins 675 Otter skins 48 Mink skins 36 Lynx
skins 33 Minks 34 Muskrat skins Many oak timbers and nut wood.
Herewith, High and Mighty Lords, be commended to the mercy of
the Almighty, In Amsterdam, the 5th of November Anno 1626 Your
High and Mightinesses’ obedient, P.Schaghen It wasn’t a “sale”
in the European sense; Minuit surely knew that for the Indians
the 60 guilders’ worth of goods he gave (which a 19th century
historian famously calculated at 24 dollars) was not an outright
payment but a token of alliance. The Indian idea was of a
defensive alliance: the Europeans would be entitled to use
Manhattan Island, and at the same time if either side was
attacked the other would come to its aid. Thus reformed, the
colony of New Netherland began to grow. More settlers arrived.
The capital at the southern tip of Manhattan – appropriately
named New Amsterdam after its parent city – became a city, if a
rough and motley one. Streets were laid out, houses went up
(with proper Dutch gables). There was a church and a fort – and
a remarkable number of taverns for so small a place. Indeed, New
Amsterdam quickly developed a reputation for semi-lawlessness.
It became a base for prosecuting the war against Spanish ships
in the Caribbean: Dutch captains who were authorized to take
Spanish and Portuguese prizes – legalized piracy, you might say
– brought the captured ships to New Amsterdam. Some of them
contained slaves, which is how slavery began on Manhattan.
Fullfledged pirates became part of the community as well.
Prostitution was a mainstay. Indeed, one of the legendary
couples of New Amsterdam comprised a Dutch-Moroccan pirate named
Anthony Van Salee (a.k.a. The Turk) and the town’s first
prostitute, Griet Reyniers. In a nice microcosm of the way the
colony would mature, after causing moral outrage for some years,
this couple eventually became leading citizens: they married,
had four children, became one of the principle landowning
families of Breuckelen (later Brooklyn), and spawned generations
of New Yorkers. New Amsterdam stayed stagnant and semilawless
for years after its founding, largely because the West India
Company maintained a monopoly on trade. No one was allowed to
make money from trading with the Indians unless they were acting
as WIC agents; but the WIC’s structure was too rigid to allow it
to exploit the colony. In the vacuum, smuggling became a main
occupation. Finally, in 1640, the company gave up its monopoly,
and from that date the colony began to flourish. Trading firms
in Amsterdam set up branch offices in New Amsterdam. Individuals
went out among the tribes along the Hudson and Mohawk rivers and
struck deals. More ships appeared in the harbor. New Amsterdam
began to grow. Then it all collapsed. In a reaction to minor
skirmishes with Indian groups, the director of the colony,
Willem Kieft, decided to declare an allout war on the natives.
Settlers were outraged. For one thing, they were vastly
outnumbered by the Indians. For another, they were there to do
business with them. But Kieft persisted, and sent WIC soldiers
on brutal raids. In reaction, Indians attacked European
settlements, burning and killing. “Kieft’s War” brought the
fledgling colony to its knees. Most importantly for history, it
convinced the inhabitants of New Amsterdam that they could not
expect the WIC to look out for their interests. They appointed a
group of nine men as their representatives. The WIC sent a new
director to the colony, a vigorous, disciplined company man
named Peter Stuyvesant. Immediately on his arrival in the spring
of 1647, the nine unofficial representatives of the community –
led by Adriaen Van der Donck, a young lawyer who had trained at
Leiden University, the premier academic institution in the Dutch
Republic – put their case before him. Stuyvesant and Van der
Donck locked horns, Stuyvesant insisting on his right to run the
colony by fiat, Van der Donck urging the newly evolving rights
of individuals. At the climax of the confrontation, Stuyvesant
ordered Van der Donck put under house arrest, and even
threatened to have him executed for treason. Ultimately, Van der
Donck was released, and he led a delegation to the Dutch
Republic, where he put the case of the colony before the
government in The Hague. His appeal was that the government take
direct control of the colony. He asked the rulers to recognize
the value of this real estate they controlled. It sat alongside
the vast North American wilderness, which in the coming decades
could become a source of untold wealth and potential. All the
Dutch leaders had to do was realize this, and assert their
rights to it. If they did not, Van der Donck warned, the English
– who had colonies at Virginia to the south and New England to
the north, and whose members were already encroaching on New
Netherland – would eventually take over. The members of the
government took Van der Donck seriously; they ordered
Stuyvesant’s recall, and considered ways to reinforce the
colony. But almost immediately after, the English government
launched a trade war against Dutch interests, and the order was
rescinded. The only part of the order that remained in effect
was one that granted New Amsterdam the status of an official
Dutch city. But that order would have lasting significance – the
chartering of New Amsterdam in 1653 remains the official date of
New York City’s chartering – as indeed would the colony as a
whole. One of the unique features of the Dutch Republic in the
17th century was its mixed character. Over the previous
centuries, the “Low Countries” had become the melting pot of
Europe. Dutch cities had unusually high concentrations of
minorities. In an age of religious strife, it was almost
universally held that a nation should be of one people and one
faith. Intolerance was thus official policy in England, Spain,
France…but not in the Dutch nation. There, tolerance became a
topic of political and religious debate. Tolerance was adopted
as policy – not as a grand ideal, but as a way to deal with the
mixed character of the population. This had its roots in the
previous century, when the Dutch provinces suffered violence
under the Spanish Inquisition; one result was the declaration in
the Union of Utrecht of 1579 that “each person shall remain
free, especially in his religion, and that no one shall be
persecuted or investigated because of their religion.” This
clause would have considerable consequences in the New World.
For one thing, it helped ensure that right from the start the
colony was a mixed community, comprising Germans, Swedes,
Italians and others. Then too, several times Peter Stuyvesant
tried to bar groups from settling in New Netherland on the
grounds that their religion would bring unrest. In 1654, Jews
appealed his ruling in the home country and won. Then when
English Quakers wanted to settle in the village of Vlissingen
(called Flushing by the English) on Long Island, Stuyvesant
again tried to bar them, and the English inhabitants also
appealed his ruling. Tolerance – “the glory of the Outward State
of Holland,” in the words of the petition – meant the Dutch
colony should allow all religious groups to settle. Again, the
Dutch authorities sided with the petitioners. This document,
called the Flushing Remonstrance, has gone down in American
history as the originating source of religious freedom in the
United States. In 1664, Adriaen van der Donck’s fears were
realized. An English gunboat flotilla entered the harbor and
took aim at the fort at the tip of Manhattan Island. Stuyvesant
reluctantly gave up his command and his colony. New Amsterdam
became New York City. Beverwijck, the second city, 150 miles
upriver, saw its name changed to Albany. Dutch rule in North
America came to an end. As far as American and Dutch history was
concerned, the Dutch legacy in North America also came to an end
in 1664. As the American colonies developed, they were seen as
English in language and culture. In 1776, when those colonies
declared their independence, it was an all-English affair: Anglo
settlements breaking free from England. The Dutch presence was
by then a distant memory. But the influence of the Dutch
presence continued. That influence is still apparent in many
small ways. Americans eat cookies instead of bisquits because
the Dutch of New Amsterdam made koekjes. The American Santa
Claus has its origins in the Dutch Sinterklaas. The word “boss”
entered the English language via the New Netherland colony from
the Dutch baas. More significantly, the Dutch Republic in the
17th century pioneered concepts of business and trade, including
the idea of shares of stock to reduce risk, as well as the
notion of tolerance as a social glue to undergird a mixed
society. Both of these features – free trade and an immigrant
culture – took root in New Amsterdam, and then in New York. They
ensured that as New York developed under English rule, it would
be a very different place from Boston, Hartford, or any other
city in English North America. When hordes of European
immigrants arrived in the United States in the 19th century,
they landed largely in New York. They looked at its teeming
society – its dense immigrant mixture and its vigorous pursuit
of trade – and took that combination to be quintessentially
American. As they moved westward – to Ohio, Indiana, Montana,
California – they brought the idea with them. In this way did
the willfulness of Henry Hudson, the legacy of New Netherland,
and the deeds of Stuyvesant and Van der Donck – not to mention
Anthony Van Salee and Griet Reyniers – evolve and spread, as the
song says, from sea to shining sea. And where are we now? Is it
possible to follow a thread that runs from that past into our
present: that connects Henry Hudson to the 21st century? Thanks
to Hudson, the city of Amsterdam bequeathed a legacy to New
York, centered on the idea of tolerance, and in so doing spawned
a new type of society. Is that legacy still apparent in the two
cities? In one sense there is reason for skepticism. With the
September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks (and it’s worth noting
that the World Trade Center towers stood at the edge of what was
once New Amsterdam), New York changed, as did much of the world.
American society hunkered down; so did Dutch society. In
Amsterdam, there was for a time a new inward-looking posture,
and a sharp rise in anti-immigration sentiments in what has long
been Europe’s most tolerant society. But in a larger sense, have
things really changed so much? If you look carefully at events
in the 17th century, you find that the Dutch invention of
tolerance came about in the midst of enormous upheaval and
turmoil. The course of that century was one of religious warfare
punctuated by periods of peace and prosperity. It was in those
tranquil periods that Dutch society, feeling secure, developed
and encouraged the idea of tolerance of others. Then, with the
advent of war, society closed down, became more conservative and
fearful and restrictive. The same cycle has occurred in our
time. We live in a period of transition, of questioning of old
verities, a time of hopefulness freighted with anxiety. But for
all the anxiety, the fruits of 17th century Amsterdam and New
York are fully evident in the 21st century cities. Turbans and
yarmulkes, Cyrillic and Cantonese, turmeric and clove: the
cityscape is a palette of tolerance. But is this not the palette
of every modern city? Indeed it is, and there lies the larger
point to be made: these features that Amsterdam in some way
pioneered in the 17th century, and transferred to New Amsterdam,
and from there to New York, making for the first multiethnic New
World city, are ubiquitous now. They are part of every modern
city, part of the definition of modern society. We might
consider that that is what began in 1609, with the unlikely,
brooding, mist-shrouded figure of Henry Hudson, and the
development shortly after he passed from the scene of a brashly
multiethnic and freetrading city on a blank slate of an island.
“How beauteous mankind is! O brave new world, that has such
people in it!” So extolled Hudson’s contemporary William
Shakespeare in The Tempest, composed right around the time
Hudson was freezing to death in Canada. The term “new world”
became fashionable in the era, and was applied to the Americas.
Today we all live in that new world, regardless of our
continent. How bravely we do is up to us. |
|
|